Accredited Investors vs. Non-Accredited
As a passive income investor you will always want to be on the lookout for new investment opportunities. The goal is to always get the highest return on your money for the smallest amount of risk. In theory, if one could get a 50% return each year by just keeping their money in the bank, there would be little reason to invest in other financial instruments like the stock market.
The problem with alternative investments is that sooner or later you will run into the term accredited vs. non-accredited investors. So, it's good to know early which type of investments you can qualify for as you look at new opportunities.
Who Defines Accredited Investors vs. Non-Accredited Investors?
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) set the requirements for accredited investors under Rule 501 of Regulation D. In simplest terms, the rule is "designed" to protect small (e.g. retail) investors from losing all their money in highly risky investments. The thinking is that someone with a lot of money will tend to be 1) a more sophisticated investor, knowing the risks associated with certain types of investments and 2) will not be financially ruined on just one bad investment deal.
In reality, we feel the SEC rules for accredited investors are outdated and need to be changed. With the amount of information now on the Internet, there are many people who are sophisticated investors, and know more about alternative assets, but may not meet the criteria in terms of income or net worth. Hopefully these rules will change over time.
Accredited Investors | Non-Accredited Investors |
---|---|
|
|
*As with any investment, the same level of due diligence should be done whether you are an accredited or non-accredited investor. Some investments carry very high risk and will just limit the number of non-accredited investors in the deal, but those individuals are taking on the same level of risk as the accredited investors for their share of the investment.